Institutionalised Racism

When I watch a film like “Mississippi Burning” or “12 Years A Slave”, sometimes, to my shame, I completely flatter myself, by identifying with the one or two white people in the film who are different to all the other white people in the film, that rare white person who is trying to help the oppressed person in the story achieve freedom and justice. I think, “yeah, if I was white in the segregated South, I’d be on the right side of that struggle.”

I don’t think these films are designed to make white people think, “I guess, statistically, it’s more likely I’d have been part of the vast majority of people upholding the racism of this time and place. It was culturally normal and common to be racist, after all.”

We look at how the racist characters in films behave – their rage, their brutality – and our consciences are pricked at how humans and their institutions could’ve ever been this barbaric. Slavery, for Christ’s sake! Separate but equal, for the love of God! We shake our heads. How was society ever like that?

But then you look at the racist settler colonial project that is taking place in the Occupied Palestinian Territories.

You see how it’s being justified by the most privileged people and institutions in the world. You see how the oppressed who non-violently fight back (and get killed doing it) are called terrorists, and the people who stand in solidarity with them are called terrorist sympathisers.

You see how this racist settler colonial project strictly limits the number of calories coming in through their blockade of the people it is deliberately malnourishing (largely children) – and calls it “putting the people of Gaza on a diet”.

You see how this settler colonial project, right in front of our so-called enlightened consciences, goes on killing sprees among the people it is occupying, and the army that conducts these massacres calls it “mowing the lawn” and gets referred to as “the most moral army in the world.”

You see how the oppressors and their enablers are even trying to curtail mere speech against their project.

When you take all that in, I think it’s possible to know exactly how institutionalised racism happens.


The left, the right, Israel and racism

I identify as a left-wing person and I have never seen (in the limited circles of people I know) an anti-Jewish comment that wasn’t immediately called out as such.

I think left-wing critics of Israel’s expansionist policies who, mistakenly or deliberately, conflate Israel with Jewish people and then go on to say anti-Jewish things stop being part of the left (on race issues) the moment they do it. Just as a Conservative voter who speaks in support of the NHS (socialised medicine) stops being part of the right (on that issue) when they do so.

Just about every human organisation, from friendship groups to workplaces need to be ever-vigilant against all forms of racism, and haven’t done enough to combat it – the evidence being that racism still exists – but I don’t see anti-Semitism (or other forms of racism) arising from any part of left-wing doctrine, as I understand it.

Here’s an exchange I saw on Twitter, to take the edge off.



If you follow me on Twitter or Facebook, you might know about my fiancé Corry and her amazing and inspiring #LookUp campaign to help improve public transport for disabled people.

The dust has settled (for now!), so here’s Corry’s #LookUp story to date in FAQ form.

I think her story underlines the importance of having a defined goal in activism. Something measurable. Not: “We want people to be nicer”, but: “We want TfL to add ‘Look Up – does someone need your seat?’ to taped announcements on bus and tube services”.

I’m just bringing this up because it seems to me that quite often people have great ideas for change that don’t become effective movements because they don’t define when they get to declare “mission accomplished” and move on to the next thing.

Anyway, hope you get time to read and share and get inspired!


Corry writes:

I was going to write a blog piece about the #LookUp campaign but it was terribly long and rambling so I’ve decided to do an FAQ instead so you can easily find the bits that are of interest to you. These FAQ’s are all questions I’ve been asked throughout the campaign either from media, friends, twitter followers or trolls.


As a rule I don’t like sharing my medical history with strangers and this is a question I would ask you not to open a conversation with! But it seems to be of interest to people. I have a condition called Scheuermann’s Disease which is a developmental disorder of the spine. Secondary conditions which have arisen because of this are DDD, osteoarthritis, bursitis, tendinopathy, nerve damage and pes planus (fallen arches). Alongside this delightful bunch I also have debilitating endometriosis. And unsurprisingly I have mental health conditions. I suffer from depression and anxiety which causes panic attacks. An unrelated mental health diagnosis is PTSD. I also unashamedly like the music of James Blunt which a lot of people would include in the ‘what’s wrong with you’ section.

My conditions mean I have mobility problems and chronic pain. I find it difficult to walk, to stand or even to sit or lie down for an extended period.


I work as a comedy producer for Impatient Productions and it is a job I love. I was bed bound for almost 2 years before I attended a Pain Management Programme at Salford Royal which helped me manage my pain to a level I could return to work part time. I’m incredibly lucky that my employers are understanding of my disability and give me the flexibility to work part time and work from home when my pain is too bad to travel. But I like to be in the office or at the shows. So I commute from South Ealing to Crouch End when I am able.

I find it incredibly hard to get a seat on public transport. I wear my ‘Please Offer Me A Seat’ badge which TfL provide to anyone who has difficulty standing but I found that people don’t notice it, they don’t even notice my walking aids because they don’t look up.

I had a particularly bad journey on June 14th which ended with me sobbing in front of a packed carriage begging to sit with everyone simultaneously staring and pretending not to notice me. I had to get off the tube and wait for the next one. My pain physically and emotionally was unbearable. I was so, so embarrassed and I have never felt more ‘disabled’ than I did at that time.

I wrote to TfL. I heard nothing. So I wrote again, to them, Chris Grayling (who was minister for Transport at the time), Sadiq Khan and I CC’d every news outlet (except the Daily Mail and the Sun) and every charity I could find contact details for. I took to social media and posted the letter there. Someone asked where the petition was. I created one. And found that I had accidentally become an activist.


There are numerous reasons people can’t ask. Personally I find it very difficult to ask as in the past I’ve sometimes been ignored, refused or given abuse…it makes each subsequent time much, much more difficult. The MAIN reason I don’t like to ask is because lots of people have invisible impairments. Not every disability is visible. I never ask someone in a priority seat to move in case they are as in need of it as I am. This is why it is vital that non disabled people that can stand for their journey offer.

Also. Some people cannot ask. They may not have speech, English may not be their first language, they may have visual impairments so may not want to ask in case the person they are asking is also disabled, they may have autism and find social interaction difficult, they may have any one of a plethora of reasons why it is just not possible for them to ask.


This is a common one and makes me so sad.

If someone offers you a seat and you don’t want or need it please be polite when you decline because you are making it so, so much harder for people that do need a seat.

If you are unsure about offering in case you cause offence you don’t need to verbally offer, just stand and if the person needs the seat believe me they will jump right in it (or sort of wobble into it if it’s me) and if they don’t need it you can sit back down safe in the knowledge that someone isn’t suffering because you are in the seat.


Not true. There are tremendous acts of kindness every day, not just in this city but everywhere. YES some people are rude but I genuinely believe most people are good and want to do the right thing. London does have a reputation for being impersonal and avoiding eye contact on the tube is a real thing. But I don’t think that’s because people are rude. They are busy, they are tired, they want to complete a level on their game, they want to answer that email, they want to read the book, they want to read the news. This doesn’t make people bad or rude. I think a little reminder to look up, a glance at each station or stop isn’t asking the world and I know that some people are already doing it. It is already making a difference.


Ahhhh trolls, you gotta love them. If you don’t want to give up your seat. Don’t. See above. We only need a few people in each carriage to want to do the right thing…and I believe they outnumber the selfish people to a huge extent. Someone once said there are only two types of people. Disabled people and people who aren’t disabled yet. Lets hope that when you are disabled, when you break your leg, when you are elderly you find more people that are kind than people like you when you travel.


This isn’t just from trolls. It is AMAZING how many people think that disabled/pregnant people don’t work or don’t have a life to get on with. I don’t think anyone would choose to travel in rush hour if they didn’t have to.

Being disabled or being pregnant doesn’t mean you don’t work, it doesn’t mean you can pick and chose which hours you travel in. And if you think it does picture this. You break your leg. What happens? Do you get to just not bother working? Do they keep you on full pay until your leg is completely healed? Do you get to go into work 2 hours late and leave 2 hours early? No. Of course not. That would be silly. Don’t be silly.


Look Up is a phrase I have grown up with. When I was a kid my mum used to tell me to ‘look up, you’ll never know what you’ll miss if you don’t look up’. She was, and still is fascinated by nature, by architecture, by astronomy and by curiosity. She used to point up and show me all the things I’d miss if I didn’t raise my eyes. When I became ill and my mental health started to deteriorate ‘Look Up’ took on a whole new meaning. I have had crisis points which have been extremely challenging for myself and my family. Look Up became a mantra and a tool to help me.

For this campaign I thought what would help me, all I need is for people to see me. I have ‘Look Up’ tattooed on my wrist. It just made sense that this reminder would be the perfect message, the perfect announcement to make people more mindful when they are travelling. It’s so simple, and so direct that it amazed me it hadn’t already been implemented.


I didn’t get a response from the customer service department. So I went online looking for individual emails within TfL that I could write to. I found the address for the Press Office which came with the disclaimer ‘Please note, the Press Office is unable to help with general queries or complaints…for media enquiries only’. But I thought it was worth a shot. Especially at this stage where I was pretty much fuelled by anger that so far I’d been ignored. So I emailed them outlining what my problems had been, what my solution was, and also that I’d been invited on to LBC for an interview that night. The response was immediate.

One of my earliest allies in the campaign was press officer Siobrha Murphy, who, it turns out was 3 days in to her new job at TfL. She wrote back to me expressing sympathy for what had happened and letting me know she was going to look into the idea and get back to me. Within the day I had a meeting set up to go into their offices to discuss the campaign. I should note that they also offered to come to me, to save me travelling, an offer which I’m still not sure they understand the impact of. It showed me that they were people empathetic with my situation and prepared to go out of their way to ensure I was comfortable. But I wanted to get things done and I knew I’d get a faster appointment if I went to them.

I met with three incredible women who spent about an hour with me talking through my experiences, discussing the possible solutions and assuring me that they would be taking it further. I left that meeting feeling positive but knowing that TfL is huge and decisions like this would probably have to go through a million hoops and forms before they could be adopted.


I knew TfL were discussing the idea and I had faith in the three women I’d met but they were not the decision makers, so I decided to continue with the petition and the campaign and focus on my next target…City Hall. I was lucky that the State Of London Debate was coming up where Londoners can table questions to the mayor. I had booked my ticket and made the arduous journey to the O2. Mr Khan was named on the petition so I knew his office was getting updates from change dot Org. I had also emailed him and Heidi Alexander (the deputy mayor for transport). I had not had a response by the time of the debate. When I asked him at the debate if he wold support the campaign and use the full weight of his office to get TfL to implement the idea, he immediately answered ‘yes, absolutely’ and that his office would contact me soon.


I am delighted to say that both TfL and City Hall have stuck to their words. Look Up is already on posters and in announcements over the tube network and I will be continuing to work with TfL to ensure that the message endures and to work out ways to roll it out across the full network.


I have been invited to speak to the working group about the implementation of the campaign throughout the national rail network. Supporters of the campaign have also launched in their own cities with Edinburgh Trams currently looking at implementation.


If you are a Londoner please tweet me every time you see or hear an announcement with the #LookUp. My twitter is @CorryShawComedy.

If you are not in London and feel inspired please take the idea to your MP, to your council, to your local public transport provider and fight to have the same message applied where you are. Let’s try to get #LookUp national, on every bus, train, tram, tube we can!

And please, wherever you are, however you travel, please be mindful of those travelling alongside you. Please look up and offer your seat if you see someone more in need of it that you are.

And if you want to do something personally for me which has nothing to do with the campaign. Please find your local comedy club and support it, buy a ticket, go laugh. I love my job as a comedy producer, I love live comedy and the support that I have had from the comedy community has been vital to me throughout this campaign. Pay it forward, buy a ticket to a show.

Please offer me a seat badges can be found here:

If you wish to find out more about accessibility for disabled travellers or wish to donate to a charity fighting for equal access to transport please support Transport For All, who have been a huge help throughout the campaign and are doing really important work. @transportforall

Here’s what has happened. In date order.

Disabled woman fighting to make commuters ‘Look Up’ on London Underground SKIP FORWARD TO 4.30 minutes.


“Anti-Americanism is a very interesting concept. It’s a concept that only exists in totalitarian states.”

Being critical of the Trump administration and its policies doesn’t make you anti-American. Being critical of Netanyahu and his government’s policies doesn’t make you anti-Israel.

As a person advocating for Palestinian human rights, I want a peaceful and secure Israel. I think the only way for that to come about is if Palestinians have their human rights upheld.

I think non-violent tactics (such as BDS) to pressure Israel to live up to its obligations under international law is a rational and moral course of action – and a tactic that has worked before.

“Anti-Americanism is a very interesting concept. It’s a concept that only exists in totalitarian states. For example, if someone in Italy, let’s say criticizing the Berlusconi government – they are not accused of being anti-Italian. In the old Soviet Union you could be condemned for being anti-Soviet, in the Brazilian military dictatorship you could be anti-Brazilian. But aside from the US, I don’t know any other non-totalitarian, non-authoritarian country where the concept even exists. That’s a very striking concept. If you’re critical of policy – you’re anti-American. Actually, this has a very interesting Biblical origin.  The first use of this concept was by King Ahab, who was the King of the ultimate evil in the Bible. He called Prophet Elijah to him and asked him why he was a hater of Israel, meaning condemning the acts of the evil king. That’s basic concept: if you challenge authority, you’re opposed to the society, the culture and the community.” – Noam Chomsky


Irresponsible Adults In The Room

Donald Trump has imposed tariffs on certain goods from the EU, China, Mexico and Canada. This will make it more expensive for these goods from these places to enter the US, and that’ll get passed through to US consumers, and it’s predictable that the US standard of living will drop. And it will effect the rest of the world.

Because jobs, or something. I don’t even think Trump knows what he’s doing.

Right-wingers like to depict themselves as the responsible adults in the room, and their fans play along. “Say what you want about (Thatcher/Regan/Bush/Trump/Farage), but they’re a hard-headed realist. China are stealing our jobs. Immigrants are stealing our jobs. Freedom of movement is stealing our jobs. I’m not a racist for saying immigrants are taking our jobs. You’re a racist for calling me a racist. I’d like to live in your snowflake world where everyone has a pony, but this is just business.”

No. It’s not business. It’s ideology.

Here’s the way I understand it. Think about international trade in terms of real things. When your country exports, you take your nation’s capacity (time, labour, materials) to create things, and then instead of your country’s people getting to benefit from it, by using what you made, you send it overseas. That actually represents a loss to your country in terms of real things. When a country exports to you, the reverse is happening. They’re using up their stuff, and instead of getting the benefit of what they made, they send it to you. Thanks! That’s our benefit, their cost.

To paraphrase economist Warren Mosler: Your nation’s real wealth is your pile of stuff. Everything you can produce at home (hopefully at full employment), plus everything the rest of the world wants to send to you, minus what you have to send to the rest of the world to get the imports.

They tell you that the purpose of the UK exporting is to create jobs, but they’ve got it backwards. In real terms, the purpose of sending stuff to other countries is because you want something from them. The purpose of exports is to get imports. The trick to master in international relations is to optimise real terms of trade. That means getting the most imports (real things) for the least exports.

The way Mosler puts it: “Every year, the Germans send the Swiss a certain number of Mercedes-Benzes, and the Swiss send back a certain amount of cheese. The game for the Swiss is to get the most Mercedes for the least cheese.” Then he jokes: “If you can get the same number of Mercedes, but you can put holes in the cheese, and nobody notices, you’re up on the deal. The Swiss have been doing it for years…”

When imports (or automation) “cost” your nation jobs, it’s supposed to be a good thing. That’s something you didn’t have to use *your* resources to get. But it’s only a good thing if you haven’t got ideological nut-jobs in charge of your economy. Like a government which, not only won’t employ the people unemployed by the imports, but they’ll run the other way – actually add to unemployment with austerity policies. We’re letting this real resource go to waste, daily. That’s a cost. A massive one.

The UK government could easily reverse this, by spending on things we all agree we need (NHS, schools, libraries, infrastructure), because as the issuer of its own currency, it can never run out of money.

This is far superior to keeping people involuntarily unemployed, or using tariffs to “bring jobs back”. If you want to bring jobs back, why not outlaw the use of computers? We can all go back to using paper and pens, and abacuses, and maybe we could also outlaw combine harvesters and we can go back to tilling the land with beasts of burden… Sure, it’s a less productive economy, but jobs, jobs, jobs!

Why am I bringing this up? Because when the results of this Trump-instigated trade war get added to the already catastrophically mismanaged unemployment situations on both sides of the Atlantic, resulting in recession or depression, and workers get more insecure, and the world lurches to the right *again* – Trump will blame Mexicans and China, and depending on who’s at the helm over here, it’ll be the fault of Brexit (which as everyone knows is Jeremy Corbyn’s fault), or if Jeremy Corbyn is prime minister, it’ll be Jeremy Corbyn’s fault, and if he goes back to just being the MP for Islington North, it’ll be Jeremy Corbyn’s fault.

Yep. Instead of blaming the culprits (neoliberal capitalists and actual Nazis) it’ll be immigrants, Brexit, and Corbyn.

Or maybe, let’s entertain a crazy idea: That right-wing ideologues – on top of being a racist, sexist, constantly bailed out, top-down class war plague of locusts – are actually bad at business.


The Extreme Centre Out-Babying Everybody, Right On Cue.

Seeing some radicals out there today actually pearl-clutching over the Trump Baby Blimp, saying that it’s “unprofessional”, or unseemly, or some other nonsense of Sadiq Kahn.


What would they be posting if Kahn hadn’t issued the permit – on the grounds that it might offend Trump and his supporters/apologists?

Probably nothing much, because as every centrist extremist knows, right-wing people aren’t themselves responsible for the things they think and feel. Right-wing people are made right-wing by the radical left calling them names.

This is why Count Dankula must have his free speech defended, but anti-Trump protesters must… Think Of The Discourse! “Civility” at all costs!

I swear, weak centrist ideologues have been scooping up and bagging so many forms of subtle and unsubtle right-wing dogshit for so long, they don’t know they’re starting to get it on them.


Education Should Be Free

Hi everybody! I started posting about politics and economics on my Facebook page quite a bit recently, so I thought I’d post here as well. If you want to join in on Facebook, I’d love it if you friended me up. I think I try to be nice, and try to make sure everyone else who joins in stays cordial. Of course you can comment here, but I’m quite enjoying Facebook. Here’s what I posted today:

It’s my feeling that education should be free*. For everyone. Until each individual is the brainiest they can be. It’s my understanding that governments sovereign in their own currency (like ours) can make any sum of money (in pounds) available for anything it wants by deficit spending. It doesn’t spend tax money when it does this. It creates the pounds when it spends. 
If we all knew this, the politicians we’ve had to suffer through on the Sunday shows today would have to change their tune or get laughed out of their jobs. I think if enough of us understood macroeconomics just a little bit, political debates wouldn’t be about “affordability” and “running out of money”, but about what we think should be provisioned, based on what would make us proud as a nation. Every single one of us would get to be the most resourceful we could be, regardless of background. Our nation’s real wealth would increase. This would be great for all of us. 

Say hi if you want to know a bit more.
In fact, here’s a bit more if you’re interested in what money actually is:
(*Free meaning you, (the person getting the education, or anyone else who will eventually benefit from your education) don’t pay in pounds. Of course there is a cost in real resources (not pounds) – if we put too many real resources (people, hardware, etc) into education and not enough into, say, growing food, we’ll starve. I understand that and obviously that’s not what I’m advocating.)